![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
bmusic Newsletter No.203 January 23rd - January 29th 2006 Something that occurred during the Christmas break I didn't get around to discussing last week was the crackdown on illegal tablature sites and the distribution of illegal tablature. In this context, tablature is a form of notation for guitarists and bassists, amongst others, but the primary offending transcriptions are guitar tablature (tab for short). There have been many, many discussions on this decision by publishers and owners of copyright since the crackdown and many of them are very, very strongly against the decision. One of the predominant comments I hear is that people justify the practice because they are unable to buy any official sheet music for the artist's they wish to learn material from. But these people fail to consider just why they can't buy a book of notation for their favourite artists. It's quite simple, there's no money in it for the publishers and, ultimately the artist's concerned, if the same material is distributed widely and freely, and illegally, online. I'm no big publishing company supporter, but they represent artists, people I am interested in seeing they get what they deserve. Of course there would be many instances in which a publisher would not see any benefit in releasing a book of transcriptions for a lot of artists as their popularity may not warrant it. But who's to know just who may or may not be able to secure themselves a reasonable sheet music deal whilst the rampant trade in copyright breaching material is in existence. And if it comes to the point where an artist didn't get a deal after this crackdown then let them decide whether they want to share their transcriptions freely themselves and let them host them on their own official sites and potentially drive more valuable traffic their way. Illegal tablature is still going strong in some places. This site is one, www.ultimate-guitar.com, and it's said to have many of the now restricted sites' material uploaded to theirs. Powertab's site has stripped all but the contributor's original compositions from it's site and it's said that all the material subject to copyright from their site is now on UG. Take a look at the Ultimate Guitar site. It's original attraction was the availability of free tabs, and has likely garnered them many, many new visitors since the closing down of countless other sites. Now, Powertab was a pretty laid back sort of a site for many years with no real revenue raising going on, merely a personal project that just kept growing and expanding. Ultimate Guitar is thick with revenue raising. The easiest to see is their banner advertising, you can even visit a page for rates of rotating banner ads HERE. Consider how many different advertisers they can serve in a day of rotating banners across tens of thousands of page hits, don't just consider one advertiser per month, it would be far more lucrative than that. Now, I understand they have a staff who are contributing to the maintenance and content of the site, and they have to pay for hosting and so forth, but the articles and columns and so forth are embellishments on what has been built around illegal tablatures. How much money of the site's advertising do you think goes to the artist responsible for writing the song? I'd suggest ZERO. So why should this site be able to profit (and likely very handsomely) from something that is not their property? It can be argued that if it's a non-profit site it's OK, and that would be a more interesting argument to have. But for sites like UG it's a different story. If you're of the opinion that UG and for profit sites like it should be allowed to continue making money off someone else's work without contributing royalties then consider if someone should be allowed a part of your weekly working wage for doing absolutely nothing to contribute to you. The analogy, in my opinion, is quite relevant. Should the above site be allowed to generate masses of traffic that bands could be using for their own official sites should they choose to publish their own transcriptions and make them freely available online? Living End offer their own transcriptions on their official site and it's a popular page to visit. This should be the only way someone should be able to access this material. It's the band's goodwill that they're available in the first place. No one but the band should be able to profit, either monetarily or via internet traffic. Another comment I hear is, "the record companies are making enough money as it is". It's not the bloody record company that's losing out here in most cases, it's the artist. An artist's sheet music deal may have absolutely nothing to do with their record company. A further comment to that, "how much more money do the artists want? They're making enough from everything else already". News flash to those people who think like that: almost all those bands and artists you think are squillionares are very, very far from it. In many cases they'd be losing money. If you think that's bunkum then, FYI, a couple of articles welll worth your perusal: Steve Albini - The Problem With Music Courtney Love's Address to Congress I welcome any discussion on the above subject, it's one I feel very passionately about in case that didn't come across! If you believe my opinion on the subject is wrong I'm more than willing to debate it with anyone. I'll leave it at that for now, it's a very involved subject and I could go on about it forever but I hope my points have been illustrated. Seems Kelly Clarkson doesn't mind biting the hand that feeds/fed. She's reportedly not allowing any of her songs to be performed by contestants on American Idol. I assume these are songs that she has penned or co-penned later on in her brief but lucrative career and not ones owned or as a direct result of the show when she appeared on it and won. Apparently she has a number of issues with the show's producers, one can only guess at why, and I bet there's some pretty juicy stuff there. She's even taken a swipe at what she calls terrible songwriters who provided the material for some of her present back catalogue, presumably again, songs provided her for the release directly following the competition. (A release, incidentally, that went something like 5 times platinum in the US and Australia and 3 times in the UK). I can understand there would likely be some real disillusionment on Kelly's part after having dealt with the masters of the management and exploitation game in the American Idol juggernaut but, seriously love, without that show you'd amount to jack right now. And that's coming from the last person on Earth to ever support Simon Cowell and co.! The music world lost another legend this week when Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame inductee Wilson Pickett passed away, aged 64, after suffering a heart attack. Perhaps Pickett's most famous of hits were "In The Midnight Hour" and "Mustang Sally, songs which brought Wilson Pickett to the attention of a whole new generation of fans after they featured heavily in the movie "The Commitments". A good obituary for Wilson can be found at the Chicago Tribute site HERE. Sydneysider guitarists may be interested in something long time subscriber John is putting together. He has a great guitar workshop for technique and theory he's hosting in March of this year and it's our pleasure to be able to let all our subscribers over that way know about it. Here's the skinny on the workshops from John: 1 day guitar workshops will be held in the city centre in March. The workshops will focus on Theory & Technique and are open to all levels. Bookings are essential as places are limited. Please contact John via e-mail by clicking HERE. Now, I promised last week that new Where Are They Now? features would commence from this issue, and I had every intention of keeping that promise, even almost completing the feature slated for this issue. But this past week is one of the most overwhelming for an influx of information and news on new products as it's the week of the annual Winter NAMM trade show in the United States, and the place a great many companies use for the announcement and showcasing of their major releases and line-ups for 2006. As such, there has been so much information and so many new images to digest this week I've simply ran out of time. Where Are They Now? WILL be back, next week, I promise! Regulars including Feature Article, The Week Ahead in Music History, Featured Artist and more are all inside Issue 203 of the bmusic Newsletter. Links in the Table of contents below will launch your browser, so you'll need to be online to view the newsletter. If you are unable to receive html format e-mails then copy and paste the following link into your browser's address bar to view the newsletter: http://www.bmusic.com.au/links/whatsnew/newsletters/archives/newsno203.html Thanks to everyone for reading, we'll see you next week! TABLE OF CONTENTS (You will need to be online to use the Table of Contents to jump through sections) Events Births Deaths |
FEATURED PRODUCTS - 2006 NAMM TRADE SHOW
THIS WEEK'S FEATURE ARTICLE - MAKING MONEY: RESELLING INDIE
THE WEEK AHEAD IN MUSIC
DON’T
WANT THE bmusic NEWSLETTER?
Copyright © 2006
![]()