![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
bmusic Newsletter No.198 November 28th - December 4th 2005 Subscriber Jade brought an excellent article in The Age during the week to our attention. The piece is an interview with former Idol judge and record executive Ian Dickson. The guy really does tell it like it is and it makes for excellent reading. Now well out of the recording and Australian Idol game "Dicko" sheds a little bit of light on the elements of Australian Idol we all knew were there but never got any attention. Check the article out for yourself by clicking HERE. On ya Dicko, I always figured you would speak your mind at some point and give some insight into the show and it's record company association. Thanks to Jade for letting us know about the article! Back on the subject of downloading and bricks and mortar record stores and such. One aspect of purchasing digital downloads versus traditional hard copy, which in this day and age is the CD, that doesn't often get raised is the loss of quality in compressed files commercially downloaded from the likes of iTunes and so forth. Now I've had a bit of a theory going on for a while that many companies from a range of industries related to music, from retailing of recorded music to the sales of the tools with which to create music (our game), have a vested interest in lowering the expectation of the masses of what good tone actually is. But that's a whole other conspiracy theory of mine, right up there with "who shot J.F.K." :D The quality of mp3 is nowhere near that of a CD by virtue of the fact it's compressed and data considered "non-essential" is discarded to reduce file size. We bemoaned the loss of quality during the shift from vinyl to CD all those years ago. The latter is debatable, but no one can argue the quality of compressed audio formats such as mp3 can rival the 16-bit linear PCM used in audio CD's. Now, the technical aspects that can be argued between the two formats include the available frequencies and the equalisation that encoding to mp3 can cause. Even at the highest mp3 encoding bitrate of 320kbps the fact remains that the 20kHz capable of being reproduced by 16-bit linear PCM can not be reached by mp3 encoding. I can hear those of you saying, "but the human ear can't really perceive much above 16kHz", and that is true. But what are those frequencies being in there doing to the overall EQ of the work. There is often a perceived mid-range boost in mp3 encoded music also. There is a stack of scientific data that can be studied and argued, and one could perform blind test after blind test. But these would only apply to bitrates far above commercial distribution rates for a start. The main point is though, you are NOT listening to the music in the way in which the artist put it down. Presumably they were happy with the result and they and their engineering and production team spent who knows how long getting the sound they were happiest with in the studio. I will go off on a slight tangent and relate this to my "conspiracy theory" about gear and the like to try and qualify that particular left field idea of mine. If you're able to lower expectations of tone of a generation you can save companies a whole bunch of R & D and manufacturing expense in developing and producing new products. Make crap recording gear to record the crap amplification another company has built so someone else can play it on their crap stereo! No one will be any the wiser from go to woe. Kinda far fetched I know, but who knows.....is there a master plan, a secret global partnership conspiring to make music production and listening so sterile and generic that the psyche of music consumers will be able to be ultimately manipulated into buying and thinking they're enjoying music made by robots? (OK, I'm taking it a bit far, and it's my little conspiracy theory I'm joking with. Fact is, the tone of most popular music is not improving in terms of listening enjoyment in my opinion). I sort of wonder, what will become of home stereo systems and the like. I mean, if more and more people rely on highly compressed encoded music formats for the delivery of their music then listen to it through two, what may as well be, big cotton buds jammed down their eardrums, what's the future for high quality home audio systems for the playback of music? There's your future for bricks and mortar record stores. More and more people are investing in high quality DVD players and digital TV systems. As mentioned last time I touched on the subject, the DVD (and now the "DualDisc" with CD and DVD content on the one double-sided disc) is being adopted more and more by record stores as an alternate (and significant) revenue stream. If someone's outlaid all those bucks on a huge tele and sound system they're going to want to listen to music on it at some stage. And such a system would quickly reveal the shortcomings of an mp3 if the owner's ears are still intact. Enter the music DVD, and buying this from the record store may even give them the idea to buy an actual CD again. Listen to that on their system and bang, they're back with us! There you go, I've gone from a global threat to tone with my conspiracy theory to hypothetically solving the issue in a few paragraphs. My work here is done. In all seriousness, I expect there will always be enough ears around yearning for what tone is all about to keep flying the flag. Vinyl still has it's place (and I don't mean for scratching across a stylus in some club where glow sticks bounce around like a dozen tribes of fireflies having a heated argument) and it's fans who keep the vinyl record pressing plants ticking over, and so it will be with CDs and 16-bit linear PCM hard copy music I expect. Be sure and check out our Featured Artist this week. The boys from Dreadnaught have been working long and hard on their newest release out in a couple of weeks and the mainstays of the Melbourne rock scene deserve everything that should be forthcoming from this newest release after battling every conceivable consequence of the recording industry as it is these days. Speak to a band like this and ask them what impact illegal downloads can have on them for some insight about who and where it hits the hardest. As mentioned last week, the present time of year in retail is less than conducive to me putting together new and fresh Where Are They Now? features so re-runs will be the order of the day for the next few weeks. But we will update them with new information where possible, as is the case in this week's feature on an Australian band that made a huge impact both here and overseas during their heyday. Regulars including Feature Article, The Week Ahead in Music History, Featured Artist and more are all inside Issue 198 of the bmusic Newsletter. Links in the Table of contents below will launch your browser, so you'll need to be online to view the newsletter. If you are unable to receive html format e-mails then copy and paste the following link into your browser's address bar to view the newsletter: http://www.bmusic.com.au/links/whatsnew/newsletters/archives/newsno198.html Thanks to everyone for reading, we'll see you next week! TABLE OF CONTENTS (You will need to be on-line to use the Table of Contents to jump through sections) Events Births Deaths |
WHERE ARE THEY NOW? - THE DIVINYLS (UPDATED)
FEATURED PRODUCT - WARWICK STREAMER LX BASS

THIS WEEK'S FEATURE ARTICLE - MASTERING: WHAT IS IT AND WHY YOU SHOULDN'T DO IT IN YOUR GARAGE
THE WEEK AHEAD IN MUSIC
DON’T
WANT THE bmusic NEWSLETTER?
Copyright © 2005
![]()