![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
bmusic Newsletter No.122 May 30th - June 5th 2004 Thought I'd raise a topic about music this week on which I've had some very interesting conversations of late with both musicians and non- musicians and one which, at least to me, seemed unusual in that both musicians and non-musicians had the same thoughts. It's with regard to music on a generational level, which style or movement of music had the most profound impact of change for popular music for each teenage generation. Sticking with the teenage years as I guess this is where the most change is occurring in one's life in which they can be influenced either way by something they relate to. For example, a good friend and musician I once had this discussion with who is about 7 or 8 years my senior suggested that the punk movement had the most impact on music throughout his teenage years. Not necessarily to him personally as he was a metal nut. But he was able to see past his own love of KISS and co. that punk was impacting most on his peers and the popular music that was appealing to the majority of those peers. Then I was once having the same conversation with a younger local musician in the store one day, I guess he's around 20. To him personally it was silverchair, and to the majority of his age group it was music of that genre, namely the music of Nirvana, that was being released well after the death of Kurt Cobain. The story of Kurt Cobain's demise likely being a contributing factor to that teenage generation relating to the music. Now to me silverchair were simply copping licks and riffs of the stuff I'd listened to a few years earlier. Anyway, we were having this discussion and it turned to what was having an influence like that in the present day. All the Blink 182's and bands of their ilk were thrown around but we couldn't see any particular one of those having as big an impact as the punk or post-grunge movements previously mentioned. I mean a few years ago there were the Green Day like bands and so on but they too didn't seem to qualify as quite as influential. We couldn't come up with an artist or genre. In hindsight this was due to two things, the fact that we were musicians passionate about our instruments, and that we weren't young enough any more to see music of today impacting us like the music of our respective "golden eras" had done. So there was a 13-year old girl awaiting her saxophone lesson sitting in the store and we turned to her and posed the question that had so engaged us. Her answer was simple and immediate, "Eminem", she said. Of course! Now turns out she's not a big fan of the guy's music, and nor am I, but that's the fella who has almost single-handedly provided that certain something that teenagers of the present day (not all, that's not my point, but the majority) relate to and are therefore impacted by. As I said, I'm not a fan of Eminem, nor am I a fan in any way of his genre, but I do respect the way in which he sometimes speaks, pretty frankly I might add, about the industry he is a part of and about modern society. One lyric he has which sticks in my mind is that in which he refers to parenting and those who listen to his music. I don't know the lyric (to be honest I don't believe I've ever heard an Eminem song and concentrated on it the whole way through) but it goes along the lines that he is not supposed to be bringing up the kids, that's the parents job. Don't put a set of headphones on them or throw them in front of the TV and expect that those sounds and images the kids take in will be edited to educate them in a savoury and morally acceptable fashion. I wish I knew the lyric, but I hope you see what I mean. So Eminem and co. are the scourge in modern music those trying to battle their teenagers today are against. Every generation has to have them, and most of each generation can't understand what it is that appeals to most of each generation that directly follows them, let alone two, three and four generations down the line. It's like me not being able to see what the big deal about Elvis wiggling his hips was, big deal. But I'm sure it was a big deal in it's day, a very big deal, just as Eminem is today. And The Beatles had long hair? Man, didn't look that long to me, you'd get away with that length at many private schools these days. How were "Can't Buy Me Love" and pretty tunes like that turning parents against their kids and vice versa?! There's that generational thing I don't get you see. So now I'll have to give away my age I suppose. What was it for me that galvanised the teenagers of my time? I guess I personally was heading toward the one band that sticks in my mind as the biggest of my teenage years before most as I was a young metal head and the harder edged stuff appealed to me. The genre now seen as pretty cheesy of "hair metal" was my cup of tea but it wasn't changing the face of popular music as much as one band that was soon to emerge. Guns 'N' Roses released "Appetite For Destruction" around 1987 and that was it. EVERYONE knew who they were, and they were not nice guys in the eyes of most parents. That's half the thing, the physical appearance of an artist, their story, their "live hard, die young" attitude, all these have an effect. Now for all I know these stories could have been manufactured and there's a far greater power at work that any of my conspiracy theories can imagine, but either way G 'N' R shook things up for a few years. (By the way, G 'N' R around 1990 or so at Melbourne's Calder Park was THE biggest show I've ever been a part of and probably the most significant concert I think I've seen). But that only relates to me and my peers, it certainly pales into insignificance against someone's story from Woodstock, or those who saw The Beatles at Shea Stadium, or those Aussies who attended Sunbury. But it's all relative. It didn't take long for grunge to emerge soon after all that and, even though I had very little of my teenage years left, I was in amongst it enough to realise that it was something rather big. Probably would be strange to others to hear me say I never really liked Nirvana even though I lived through their emergence. That's not the part that may seem odd. The odd part is that my favourite all-time band, if I had to name one, is Pearl Jam. Due in no small part to the fact that they throw the best concerts I have ever been to and the three shows I've seen of them would be in my Top Five concerts I've ever attended. Actually, for the music they are probably 1, 2 and 3. Now the musician part of me probably had influenced how I embraced the "grunge" movement, but most of my peers were certainly affected by Nirvana, whereas I was the Alice in Chains, Soundgarden and Pearl Jam guy. But they were all eventually thrown in the mix when record execs descended on Seattle en masse at the time. I should make note of Metallica. Of course, as a metal head they had a profound impact on me personally, but even the massive Black album of 1990 I don't think impacted as much on popular music for the majority of my generation as those aforementioned artists. So my story has two great movements, the G 'N' R inspired stuff (which early Aerosmith fans were likely talking about in the same way I spoke of silverchair earlier) and the "grunge" phenomenon. A movement as big as grunge hasn't hit since I don't believe, but that generational thing is only making things less and less recognisable. Now I'd love to have some feedback from our subscribers. We have such a large audience and such a wide variety of ages what it would be fascinating to read about what hit you, what was your "grunge"? We could share the feedback we get with all subscribers over the coming weeks if we get enough. So drop me a line personally HERE and let me know the bands or artists you now look back on fondly as I do Guns 'N' Roses. I very much look forward to your replies. Phew! I "think" that rant makes sense :) We had a great e-mail this week from a former member of a band we featured in our Where Are They Now? back in January of 2003. He gave us "horses mouth" updates on what most of his fellow former band mates had been up to more recently and let us know about his new group. So this week's Where Are They Now? revisits the band and includes the new information, and a tie-in is this week's Feature Artist. The least we could do to thank the guy was to feature his band. For the record, he thought our original feature was great! Now he's not the only former member to drop us a line. Back in May, 2003 the band's bassist also contacted us and filled us in on his movements. The information he gave us is also included in this week's recap. Regulars including Feature Article, The Week Ahead in Music History, Featured Product and more are all inside Issue 122 of the bmusic Newsletter. Links in the Table of contents below will launch your browser, so you'll need to be online to view the newsletter. If you are unable to receive html format e-mails then copy and paste the following link into your browser's address bar to view the newsletter: http://www.bmusic.com.au/links/whatsnew/newsletters/archives/newsno122.html Thanks to everyone for reading, we'll see you next week! TABLE OF CONTENTS (You will need to be on-line to use the Table of Contents to jump through sections) Events Births Deaths |
WHERE ARE THEY NOW? - UGLY KID JOE
|
Ugly Kid Joe formed in Isla Vista, near Santa Barbara, California in 1989 when vocalist Whitfield Crane teamed up with guitarist Klaus Eichstadt.
Soon bassist Cordell Crockett, whose father was owner of Guitar Player magazine at the time, joined the Crane and Eichstadt, with
drummer Mark Davis to follow soon after. After beginning their journey as SWAT (Suburban White Alcoholic Trash) the band soon landed a support slot for Pretty Boy Floyd as they made their way through Santa Barbara. The band parodied the name Pretty By Floyd by tagging themselves as the antithesis, Ugly Kid Joe. The show never actually went ahead but the new name stuck. After playing less than twenty shows in their native Santa Barbara, UKJ were picked up by Mercury Records off-shoot label, stardog records. The band's demo "As Ugly As They Wanna Be" had made it from the hands of a local DJ to stardog and the label set about sending UKJ to the top. The lead single from the EP "Everything About You" rocketed to Number 1 in the U.S., with particular thanks going to it's inclusion in the popular movie "Wayne's World". By 1993 the band had released their first full-length album "America's Least Wanted". Original drummer Mark Davis had since left the band, reportedly due to some mental health problems. He was replaced by ex-Wraithchild drummer Shannon Larkin. Second guitarist Roger Lahr had also been replaced by ex-Sugartooth axeman Dave Fortman. The album included the smash "Everything About You" from the group's first release, along with their massively popular version of Harry Chapin's "Cats In The Cradle". |
FEATURED PRODUCT - NEW MXR PEDALS FOR 2004

VINTAGE AND ITEMS OF INTEREST AVAILABLE AT bmusic
THE WEEK AHEAD IN MUSIC
DON’T
WANT THE bmusic NEWSLETTER?
Copyright © 2004
![]()